Lava Shark 5G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo V50 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 5G

Lava Shark 5G
-
Unisoc T765
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.75"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
13 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
2.3 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76
2.1 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55
1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715
3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
12GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
12GB 512GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), AF
f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@30fps
f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N66, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N66, N77, N78
In this comparison, the Vivo V50 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 5G with the Unisoc Unisoc T765 (6nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
Vivo V50 has a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 5G uses an LCD panel. Moreover, Vivo V50 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling. These phones offer the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Vivo V50 has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Vivo V50 has a larger 6000 mAh battery for longer usage. Vivo V50 supports faster wired charging at 90W.
Vivo V50 offers better water and dust resistance with an IP69 rating.