Lava Shark 5G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo X200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 5G
Lava Shark 5G
-
Unisoc T765
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.75"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
13 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
2.3 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76
2.1 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55
1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925
3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720
16GB 512GB (UFS 4.0)
(wide), AF
f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p
f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide)
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
7 5G bands
n1, n5, n8, n28, n40, n77, n78
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo X200 with its Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 5G with the Unisoc Unisoc T765 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Vivo X200 offers 4 years of OS updates, while Lava Shark 5G does not have confirmed OS update information. Vivo X200 receives 5 years of security updates, while Lava Shark 5G does not have confirmed security update information.
Vivo X200 features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 5G comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Vivo X200 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Vivo X200 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Vivo X200 features a larger 5800 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo X200 also supports faster wired charging at 90W, compared to 18W on Lava Shark 5G.
Vivo X200 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP69 rating.
- Lava Shark 5G – Check price here
- Vivo X200 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.