Lava Shark 5G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 5G

Lava Shark 5G
-
Unisoc T765
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.75"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
13 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
2.3 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76
2.1 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/2.5, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this comparison, the Vivo Y300 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 5G with the Unisoc Unisoc T765 (6nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
Vivo Y300 has a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 5G uses an LCD panel. Moreover, Vivo Y300 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling. These phones offer the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Vivo Y300 has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Both phones have the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Vivo Y300 supports faster wired charging at 80W.
Vivo Y300 offers better water and dust resistance with an IP64 rating.
- Lava Shark 5G – Check price here
- Vivo Y300 – Check price here