Lava Shark 5G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 Plus alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 5G
Lava Shark 5G
-
Unisoc T765
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.75"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
13 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
Vivo Y300 Plus
Vivo Y300 Plus
-
Snapdragon 695
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
44W
-
6.78"
1080 x 2400 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
2.3 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76
2.1 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55
2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold
6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver
(wide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/2.5, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8
TDD: N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo Y300 Plus with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 5G with the Unisoc Unisoc T765 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Vivo Y300 Plus features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 5G comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Vivo Y300 Plus offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Vivo Y300 Plus offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Vivo Y300 Plus also supports faster wired charging at 44W, compared to 18W on Lava Shark 5G.
Both phones feature the same IP54 rating for water and dust resistance.
- Lava Shark 5G – Check price here
- Vivo Y300 Plus – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.