Lava Shark 5G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
vivo Y400 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 5G

Lava Shark 5G
-
Unisoc T765
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.75"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
13 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
2.3 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76
2.1 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 3.1)
(wide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/2.45, (wide), 1/3.1", 0.7µm
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
FDD: N1, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the vivo Y400 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 5G with the Unisoc Unisoc T765 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
vivo Y400 features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 5G comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, vivo Y400 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, vivo Y400 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
vivo Y400 features a larger 6000 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. vivo Y400 also supports faster wired charging at 90W, compared to 18W on Lava Shark 5G.
vivo Y400 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP69 rating.
- Lava Shark 5G – Check price here
- vivo Y400 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.