Lava Storm Lite alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo X200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Storm Lite

Lava Storm Lite
-
Dimensity 6400
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
15W
-
6.75"
720 x 1600 pixels
-
50 MP
1440p@30fps
-
Specs
2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925
3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720
4GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
16GB 512GB (UFS 4.0)
Wide Angle
f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@30fps
1080p
f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide)
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo X200 with its Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3nm) performs better than the Lava Storm Lite with the Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Vivo X200 offers 4 years of OS updates, whereas Lava Storm Lite provides 1 years. For security updates, Vivo X200 offers 5 years of support compared to Lava Storm Lite's 2 years.
Vivo X200 features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Storm Lite comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Vivo X200 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Vivo X200 features a larger 5800 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo X200 also supports faster wired charging at 90W, compared to 15W on Lava Storm Lite.
Vivo X200 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP69 rating.
- Lava Storm Lite – Check price here
- Vivo X200 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.