Lava Yuva 4 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Motorola Edge 50 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Yuva 4 4G

Lava Yuva 4 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
10W
-
6.56"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Motorola Edge 50

Motorola Edge 50
-
Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
4 nm
-
5000 mAh
68W
-
6.7"
1220x2712 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
- Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710
3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
4GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), AF
VGA
Auxiliary lens
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
10 MP
f2.0, 72mm (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, 3x optical zoom, OIS
13 MP
f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, PDAF
1080p@30/60fps
f/2.4, (wide), 0.7µm
1080p@30/120fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
14 5G bands
n1, n2, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n28, n38, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Motorola Edge 50 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Yuva 4 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Motorola Edge 50 offers 2 years of OS updates, whereas Lava Yuva 4 4G provides 1 years. For security updates, Motorola Edge 50 offers 3 years of support compared to Lava Yuva 4 4G's 2 years.
Motorola Edge 50 features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Yuva 4 4G comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Motorola Edge 50 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Motorola Edge 50 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 also supports faster wired charging at 68W, compared to 10W on Lava Yuva 4 4G. Motorola Edge 50 supports wireless charging at 15W, while Lava Yuva 4 4G lacks this feature.
Motorola Edge 50 includes an IP68 rating, while Lava Yuva 4 4G lacks an official IP rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.