Lava Yuva 4 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Redmi Note 13 Pro+ alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Yuva 4 4G

Lava Yuva 4 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
10W
-
6.56"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Redmi Note 13 Pro+

Redmi Note 13 Pro+
-
Dimensity 7200 Ultra
4 nm
-
5000 mAh
120W
-
6.67"
1220x2712 pixels
-
200 MP
4K@24/30fps
-
Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510
4GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
12GB 256GB (UFS 3.1)
8GB 512GB (UFS 3.1)
12GB 512GB (UFS 3.1)
16GB 512GB (UFS 3.1)
(wide), AF
VGA
Auxiliary lens
f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
1080p@30/60/120fps
f/2.4, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ with its Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4nm) performs better than the Lava Yuva 4 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Redmi Note 13 Pro+ offers 3 years of OS updates, whereas Lava Yuva 4 4G provides 1 years. For security updates, Redmi Note 13 Pro+ offers 4 years of support compared to Lava Yuva 4 4G's 2 years.
Redmi Note 13 Pro+ features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Yuva 4 4G comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Redmi Note 13 Pro+ offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Redmi Note 13 Pro+ offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Redmi Note 13 Pro+ also supports faster wired charging at 120W, compared to 10W on Lava Yuva 4 4G.
Redmi Note 13 Pro+ includes an IP68 rating, while Lava Yuva 4 4G lacks an official IP rating.
- Redmi Note 13 Pro+ – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.