Lava Yuva 4 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo X200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Yuva 4 4G
Lava Yuva 4 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
10W
-
6.56"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925
3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720
4GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
16GB 512GB (UFS 4.0)
(wide), AF
VGA
Auxiliary lens
f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p
f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide)
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo X200 with its Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3nm) performs better than the Lava Yuva 4 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Vivo X200 offers 4 years of OS updates, whereas Lava Yuva 4 4G provides 1 years. For security updates, Vivo X200 offers 5 years of support compared to Lava Yuva 4 4G's 2 years.
Vivo X200 features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Yuva 4 4G comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Vivo X200 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Vivo X200 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Vivo X200 features a larger 5800 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo X200 also supports faster wired charging at 90W, compared to 10W on Lava Yuva 4 4G.
Vivo X200 includes an IP69 rating, while Lava Yuva 4 4G lacks an official IP rating.
- Vivo X200 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.