Lava Yuva Star 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Yuva Star 4G

Lava Yuva Star 4G
-
Unisoc SC9863A
28 nm
-
5000 mAh
10W
-
6.75"
720 x 1600 pixels
-
13 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Motorola Edge 50 Neo

Motorola Edge 50 Neo
-
Dimensity 7300
4 nm
-
4310 mAh
68W
-
6.4"
1256 x 2760 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55
4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
12GB 512GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.5", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
10 MP
f/2.0, 73mm (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
13 MP
f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, PDAF
1080p@30/60/120/240fps
f/2.4, (wide), 0.7µm
1080p@30/60/120fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: eSIM
FDD: N1, N2, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N26, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N66, N75, N77, N78
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N66 / N75 / N77 / N78
In this comparison, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo with the Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Yuva Star 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc SC9863A (28nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo offers 5 years of OS updates, while the Lava Yuva Star 4G provides 1 years. When it comes to security updates, Motorola Edge 50 Neo leads with 5 years of support.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Yuva Star 4G uses an LCD panel. Moreover, Motorola Edge 50 Neo offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling. These phones offer the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Lava Yuva Star 4G has a larger 5000 mAh battery for longer usage. Motorola Edge 50 Neo supports faster wired charging at 68W. Motorola Edge 50 Neo supports wireless charging at 15W, while Lava Yuva Star 4G lacks this feature.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has an IP68 rating, while Lava Yuva Star 4G lacks official water and dust resistance.