Lava Yuva Star 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Redmi Note 13 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Yuva Star 4G

Lava Yuva Star 4G
-
Unisoc SC9863A
28 nm
-
5000 mAh
10W
-
6.75"
720 x 1600 pixels
-
13 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Redmi Note 13

Redmi Note 13
-
Dimensity 6080
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
33W
-
6.67"
1080x2400 pixels
-
108 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
12GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
12GB 512GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), AF
f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/2.4, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N78
In this performance comparison, the Redmi Note 13 with its Mediatek Dimensity 6080 (6nm) performs better than the Lava Yuva Star 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc SC9863A (28nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Redmi Note 13 offers 3 years of OS updates, whereas Lava Yuva Star 4G provides 1 years. For security updates, Redmi Note 13 offers 4 years of support compared to Lava Yuva Star 4G's 2 years.
Redmi Note 13 features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Yuva Star 4G comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Redmi Note 13 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Redmi Note 13 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Redmi Note 13 also supports faster wired charging at 33W, compared to 10W on Lava Yuva Star 4G.
Redmi Note 13 includes an IP54 rating, while Lava Yuva Star 4G lacks an official IP rating.
- Redmi Note 13 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.