Lava Yuva Star 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy A16 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Yuva Star 4G

Lava Yuva Star 4G
-
Unisoc SC9863A
28 nm
-
5000 mAh
10W
-
6.75"
720 x 1600 pixels
-
13 MP
1080p@30fps
Samsung Galaxy A16

Samsung Galaxy A16
-
Helio G99
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.7"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
6GB 256GB (UFS 2.0)
(wide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), AF
5 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
f/2.0, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N26, N28, N66
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
TDD N40 / N41 / N77 / N78
In this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A16 with the Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) performs better than the Lava Yuva Star 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc SC9863A (28nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
The Samsung Galaxy A16 offers 6 years of OS updates, while the Lava Yuva Star 4G provides 1 years. When it comes to security updates, Samsung Galaxy A16 leads with 6 years of support.
Samsung Galaxy A16 has a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Yuva Star 4G uses an LCD panel. Moreover, Samsung Galaxy A16 offers a higher 90 Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling. These phones offer the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Samsung Galaxy A16 has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Both phones have the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A16 supports faster wired charging at 25W.
Samsung Galaxy A16 has an IP54 rating, while Lava Yuva Star 4G lacks official water and dust resistance.