Lava Yuva Star 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy A17 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Yuva Star 4G
Lava Yuva Star 4G
-
Unisoc SC9863A
28 nm
-
5000 mAh
10W
-
6.75"
720 x 1600 pixels
-
13 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Samsung Galaxy A17
Samsung Galaxy A17
-
Exynos 1330
5 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.7"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS
-
Specs
4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF, OIS
5 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro), 1/5.0", 1.75µm
f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
13 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n6, n7, n8, n26, n28, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A17 with its Exynos 1330 (5nm) performs better than the Lava Yuva Star 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc SC9863A (28nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy A17 launched with Android 15 and will receive updates until Android 21, whereas Lava Yuva Star 4G launched with Android 14 Go and will get Android 15. Samsung Galaxy A17 will get security updates until 2031 (approx. 6 years), while Lava Yuva Star 4G is supported till 2026.
Samsung Galaxy A17 features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Yuva Star 4G comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Samsung Galaxy A17 offers a higher 90 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Samsung Galaxy A17 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A17 also supports faster wired charging at 25W, compared to 10W on Lava Yuva Star 4G.
Samsung Galaxy A17 includes an IP54 rating, while Lava Yuva Star 4G lacks an official IP rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.