Lava Yuva Star 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
vivo T4 Pro alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Yuva Star 4G
Lava Yuva Star 4G
-
Unisoc SC9863A
28 nm
-
5000 mAh
10W
-
6.75"
720 x 1600 pixels
-
13 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
vivo T4 Pro
vivo T4 Pro
-
Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
4 nm
-
6500 mAh
90W
-
6.77"
1080 x 2392 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
- Specs
4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55
1x2.8 GHz Cortex-720
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-720
3x1.8 GHz Cortex-520
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
12GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), AF
f/1.79, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, Sony IMX882, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.65, 73mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, Sony IMX882, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom, 100x Digital Zoom
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS, OIS
f/2.45, 30mm (wide)
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
11 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n38, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the vivo T4 Pro with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Yuva Star 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc SC9863A (28nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
vivo T4 Pro launched with Android 15 and will receive updates until Android 19, whereas Lava Yuva Star 4G launched with Android 14 Go and will get Android 15. vivo T4 Pro will get security updates until 2031 (approx. 6 years), while Lava Yuva Star 4G is supported till 2026.
vivo T4 Pro features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Yuva Star 4G comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, vivo T4 Pro offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, vivo T4 Pro offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
vivo T4 Pro features a larger 6500 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. vivo T4 Pro also supports faster wired charging at 90W, compared to 10W on Lava Yuva Star 4G.
vivo T4 Pro includes an IP69 rating, while Lava Yuva Star 4G lacks an official IP rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.