Lava Yuva Star 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo V40 Pro alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Yuva Star 4G

Lava Yuva Star 4G
-
Unisoc SC9863A
28 nm
-
5000 mAh
10W
-
6.75"
720 x 1600 pixels
-
13 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Vivo V40 Pro

Vivo V40 Pro
-
Dimensity 9200+
4 nm
-
5500 mAh
80W
-
6.78"
1260x2800 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55
1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3
3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510
12GB 512GB (UFS 3.1)
(wide), AF
f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/1.9, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS, 2x optical zoom
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@30fps
f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
TDD N40 / N77 / N78
In this comparison, the Vivo V40 Pro with the Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4nm) performs better than the Lava Yuva Star 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc SC9863A (28nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
The Vivo V40 Pro offers 3 years of OS updates, while the Lava Yuva Star 4G provides 1 years. When it comes to security updates, Vivo V40 Pro leads with 4 years of support.
Vivo V40 Pro has a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Yuva Star 4G uses an LCD panel. Moreover, Vivo V40 Pro offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling. These phones offer the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Vivo V40 Pro has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Vivo V40 Pro has a larger 5500 mAh battery for longer usage. Vivo V40 Pro supports faster wired charging at 80W.
Vivo V40 Pro has an IP68 rating, while Lava Yuva Star 4G lacks official water and dust resistance.