Lava Yuva Star 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo V40e alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Yuva Star 4G
Lava Yuva Star 4G
-
Unisoc SC9863A
28 nm
-
5000 mAh
10W
-
6.75"
720 x 1600 pixels
-
13 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), AF
f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 116˚ (ultrawide)
1080p
f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo V40e with its Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Yuva Star 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc SC9863A (28nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Vivo V40e offers 3 years of OS updates, whereas Lava Yuva Star 4G provides 1 years. For security updates, Vivo V40e offers 4 years of support compared to Lava Yuva Star 4G's 2 years.
Vivo V40e features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Yuva Star 4G comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Vivo V40e offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Vivo V40e offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Vivo V40e features a larger 5500 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo V40e also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 10W on Lava Yuva Star 4G.
Vivo V40e includes an IP64 rating, while Lava Yuva Star 4G lacks an official IP rating.
- Vivo V40e – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.