Lava Yuva Star 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo V40e alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Yuva Star 4G
Lava Yuva Star 4G
-
Unisoc SC9863A
28 nm
-
5000 mAh
10W
-
6.75"
720 x 1600 pixels
-
13 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), AF
f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 116˚ (ultrawide)
1080p
f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
TDD N40 / N77 / N78
In this comparison, the Vivo V40e with the Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Yuva Star 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc SC9863A (28nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
The Vivo V40e offers 3 years of OS updates, while the Lava Yuva Star 4G provides 1 years. When it comes to security updates, Vivo V40e leads with 4 years of support.
Vivo V40e has a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Yuva Star 4G uses an LCD panel. Moreover, Vivo V40e offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling. These phones offer the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Vivo V40e has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Vivo V40e has a larger 5500 mAh battery for longer usage. Vivo V40e supports faster wired charging at 80W.
Vivo V40e has an IP64 rating, while Lava Yuva Star 4G lacks official water and dust resistance.