Lava Yuva Star 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo V50 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Yuva Star 4G

Lava Yuva Star 4G
-
Unisoc SC9863A
28 nm
-
5000 mAh
10W
-
6.75"
720 x 1600 pixels
-
13 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55
1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715
3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
12GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
12GB 512GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), AF
f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@30fps
f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N66, N77, N78
TDD N40 / N66 / N77 / N78
In this comparison, the Vivo V50 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Yuva Star 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc SC9863A (28nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
The Vivo V50 offers 3 years of OS updates, while the Lava Yuva Star 4G provides 1 years. When it comes to security updates, Vivo V50 leads with 4 years of support.
Vivo V50 has a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Yuva Star 4G uses an LCD panel. Moreover, Vivo V50 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling. These phones offer the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Vivo V50 has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Vivo V50 has a larger 6000 mAh battery for longer usage. Vivo V50 supports faster wired charging at 90W.
Vivo V50 has an IP69 rating, while Lava Yuva Star 4G lacks official water and dust resistance.