Lava Yuva Star 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo V50 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Yuva Star 4G

Lava Yuva Star 4G
-
Unisoc SC9863A
28 nm
-
5000 mAh
10W
-
6.75"
720 x 1600 pixels
-
13 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55
1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715
3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
12GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
12GB 512GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), AF
f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@30fps
f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N66, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N66, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo V50 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Yuva Star 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc SC9863A (28nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Vivo V50 offers 3 years of OS updates, whereas Lava Yuva Star 4G provides 1 years. For security updates, Vivo V50 offers 4 years of support compared to Lava Yuva Star 4G's 2 years.
Vivo V50 features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Yuva Star 4G comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Vivo V50 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Vivo V50 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Vivo V50 features a larger 6000 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo V50 also supports faster wired charging at 90W, compared to 10W on Lava Yuva Star 4G.
Vivo V50 includes an IP69 rating, while Lava Yuva Star 4G lacks an official IP rating.
- Vivo V50 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.