Lava Yuva Star 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo X200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Yuva Star 4G
Lava Yuva Star 4G
-
Unisoc SC9863A
28 nm
-
5000 mAh
10W
-
6.75"
720 x 1600 pixels
-
13 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55
1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925
3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720
16GB 512GB (UFS 4.0)
(wide), AF
f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p
f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide)
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo X200 with its Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3nm) performs better than the Lava Yuva Star 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc SC9863A (28nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Vivo X200 offers 4 years of OS updates, whereas Lava Yuva Star 4G provides 1 years. For security updates, Vivo X200 offers 5 years of support compared to Lava Yuva Star 4G's 2 years.
Vivo X200 features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Yuva Star 4G comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Vivo X200 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Vivo X200 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Vivo X200 features a larger 5800 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo X200 also supports faster wired charging at 90W, compared to 10W on Lava Yuva Star 4G.
Vivo X200 includes an IP69 rating, while Lava Yuva Star 4G lacks an official IP rating.
- Vivo X200 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.