Lava Yuva Star 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
vivo X200 FE alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Yuva Star 4G

Lava Yuva Star 4G
-
Unisoc SC9863A
28 nm
-
5000 mAh
10W
-
6.75"
720 x 1600 pixels
-
13 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
vivo X200 FE

vivo X200 FE
-
Dimensity 9300+
4 nm
-
6500 mAh
90W
-
6.31"
1216 x 2640 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30/60fps
-
Specs
4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55
1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4
3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720
16GB 512GB (UFS 3.1)
(wide), AF
f/1.88, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, Sony IMX921, PDAF
50 MP
f/2.65, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, Sony IMX882, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
8 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, HDR
f/2.0, (wide), Samsung JN1
1080p
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N26, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N71, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N26, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N71, N77, N78
In this comparison, the vivo X200 FE with the Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4nm) performs better than the Lava Yuva Star 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc SC9863A (28nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
The vivo X200 FE offers 4 years of OS updates, while the Lava Yuva Star 4G provides 1 years. When it comes to security updates, vivo X200 FE leads with 5 years of support.
vivo X200 FE has a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Yuva Star 4G uses an LCD panel. Moreover, vivo X200 FE offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling. These phones offer the same brightness level at nits. Notably, vivo X200 FE has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
vivo X200 FE has a larger 6500 mAh battery for longer usage. vivo X200 FE supports faster wired charging at 90W.
vivo X200 FE has an IP69 rating, while Lava Yuva Star 4G lacks official water and dust resistance.
- vivo X200 FE – Check price here