Lava Yuva Star 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Yuva Star 4G
Lava Yuva Star 4G
-
Unisoc SC9863A
28 nm
-
5000 mAh
10W
-
6.75"
720 x 1600 pixels
-
13 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/2.5, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41
TDD N40 / N77 / N78
In this comparison, the Vivo Y300 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Yuva Star 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc SC9863A (28nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
The Vivo Y300 offers 2 years of OS updates, while the Lava Yuva Star 4G provides 1 years. When it comes to security updates, Vivo Y300 leads with 3 years of support.
Vivo Y300 has a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Yuva Star 4G uses an LCD panel. Moreover, Vivo Y300 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling. These phones offer the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Vivo Y300 has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Both phones have the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Vivo Y300 supports faster wired charging at 80W.
Vivo Y300 has an IP64 rating, while Lava Yuva Star 4G lacks official water and dust resistance.