Moto G86 Power alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo V40 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Moto G86 Power

Moto G86 Power
-
Dimensity 7400
4 nm
-
6720 mAh
33W
-
6.67"
1220 x 2712 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30/60fps
- Specs
4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715
3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
12GB 512GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.88, 25mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, Sony LYT600, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 12mm, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF
f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS
1080p@30fps
f/2.2, (wide), 0.7µm
f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo V40 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Moto G86 Power with the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Vivo V40 offers 3 years of OS updates, whereas Moto G86 Power provides 1 years. For security updates, Vivo V40 offers 4 years of support compared to Moto G86 Power's 3 years.
Both Moto G86 Power and Vivo V40 feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at 4500 nits. Notably, Vivo V40 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Moto G86 Power comes with a larger 6720 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Vivo V40 also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 33W on Moto G86 Power.
Moto G86 Power offers better protection against water and dust with an IP69 rating.
- Vivo V40 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.