Moto G96 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Poco C75 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78
4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, Sony LYT-700C, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF
f/1.8, (wide)
Auxiliary lens
1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS
f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm
f/2.2, (wide)
1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
13 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n26, n28, n38, n40, n41, n77, n78
7 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n78
In this performance comparison, the Moto G96 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Poco C75 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both phones launched with Android 15 and will get updates until Android 16. Both phones are expected to receive security updates until around 2028.
Moto G96 features a superior AMOLED display, while Poco C75 comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Moto G96 offers a higher 144 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Moto G96 also boasts a brighter screen with 1600 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Moto G96 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Moto G96 comes with a larger 5500 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Moto G96 also supports faster wired charging at 33W, compared to 18W on Poco C75.
Moto G96 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP68 rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.