Moto G96 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F14 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F14

Samsung Galaxy F14
-
Exynos 1330
5 nm
-
6000 mAh
25W
-
6.6"
1080x2408 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78
4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
6GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, Sony LYT-700C, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS
f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm
f/2.0, (wide)
1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
13 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n26, n28, n38, n40, n41, n77, n78
13 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n28, n38, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Moto G96 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy F14 with the Exynos 1330 (5nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy F14 offers 2 years of OS updates, whereas Moto G96 provides 1 years. For security updates, Samsung Galaxy F14 offers 4 years of support compared to Moto G96's 3 years.
Moto G96 features a superior AMOLED display, while Samsung Galaxy F14 comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Moto G96 offers a higher 144 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Both phones have the same screen resolution.
Samsung Galaxy F14 features a larger 6000 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Moto G96 also supports faster wired charging at 33W, compared to 25W on Samsung Galaxy F14.
Moto G96 includes an IP68 rating, while Samsung Galaxy F14 lacks an official IP rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.