Moto G96 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo V40e alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78
4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, Sony LYT-700C, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF
f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 116˚ (ultrawide)
1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS
1080p
f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm
f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
13 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n26, n28, n38, n40, n41, n77, n78
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo V40e with its Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) performs better than the Moto G96 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Vivo V40e launched with Android 14 and will receive updates until Android 17, whereas Moto G96 launched with Android 15 and will get Android 16. Both phones are expected to receive security updates until around 2028.
Both Moto G96 and Vivo V40e feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. In terms of smoothness, Moto G96 offers a higher 144 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Vivo V40e also boasts a brighter screen with 4500 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Both phones have the same screen resolution.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5500 mAh battery capacity. Vivo V40e also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 33W on Moto G96.
Moto G96 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP68 rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.