Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G

Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra

Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
-
Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
4 nm
-
4500 mAh
125W
-
6.7"
1220x2712 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30/60fps
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720
3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520
16GB 512GB (UFS 4.0)
16GB 1024GB (UFS 4.0)
(wide), AF
(f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, multi-directional PDAF, Laser AF, OIS)
64 MP
(f/2.4, 72mm (periscope telephoto), 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom)
50 MP
(f/2.0, 12mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 0.64µm, AF)
1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps
(f/1.9, (wide), 0.64µm, AF)
1080p@30/60/120fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: eSIM
FDD: N1, N2, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N26, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N66, N71, N75, N77, N78
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N66 / N75 / N77 / N78
In this comparison, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 4G uses an LCD panel. Moreover, Motorola Edge 50 Ultra offers a higher 144 Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling. These phones offer the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Lava Shark 4G has a larger 5000 mAh battery for longer usage. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra supports faster wired charging at 125W. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra supports wireless charging at 50W, while Lava Shark 4G lacks this feature.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra offers better water and dust resistance with an IP68 rating.