Motorola Edge 60 Stylus alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Poco F6 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Motorola Edge 60 Stylus

Motorola Edge 60 Stylus
-
Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
4 nm
-
5000 mAh
68W
-
6.7"
1220 x 2712 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
- Specs
4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720
3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520
12GB 512GB (UFS 4.0)
f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP
f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF
(f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS)
8 MP
((ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm)
1080p@30/60/120fps
1080p@30/60/120/240fps
f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm
f/2.2, (wide), 0.8µm
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: eSIM
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
11 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n38, n40, n41, n48, n77, n78
14 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n28, n38, n40, n41, n48, n66, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Poco F6 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Motorola Edge 60 Stylus with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Poco F6 offers 3 years of OS updates, whereas Motorola Edge 60 Stylus provides 2 years. For security updates, Poco F6 offers 4 years of support compared to Motorola Edge 60 Stylus's 3 years.
Both Motorola Edge 60 Stylus and Poco F6 feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Motorola Edge 60 Stylus also boasts a brighter screen with 3000 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Both phones have the same screen resolution.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Poco F6 also supports faster wired charging at 90W, compared to 68W on Motorola Edge 60 Stylus. Motorola Edge 60 Stylus supports wireless charging at 15W, while Poco F6 does not support wireless charging.
Motorola Edge 60 Stylus offers better protection against water and dust with an IP68 rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.