Motorola Moto G35 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F34 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Motorola Moto G35

Motorola Moto G35
-
Unisoc T760
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.72"
1080 x 2400 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
Samsung Galaxy F34

Samsung Galaxy F34
-
Exynos 1280
5 nm
-
6000 mAh
25W
-
6.5"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
1x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76
3x Cortex-A76
4x Cortex-A55
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8 (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP
f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP
f/2.4
1080p@30fps
1080p@30fps
f/2.5, (wide), 1.0µm
f/2.2, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N26, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N26, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N78
In this performance comparison, the Samsung Galaxy F34 with its Exynos 1280 (5nm) performs better than the Motorola Moto G35 with the Unisoc Unisoc T760 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy F34 offers 4 years of OS updates, whereas Motorola Moto G35 provides 1 years. For security updates, Samsung Galaxy F34 offers 5 years of support compared to Motorola Moto G35's 2 years.
Samsung Galaxy F34 features a superior AMOLED display, while Motorola Moto G35 comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at 1000 nits. Both phones have the same screen resolution.
Samsung Galaxy F34 features a larger 6000 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Samsung Galaxy F34 also supports faster wired charging at 25W, compared to 18W on Motorola Moto G35.
Samsung Galaxy F34 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP67 rating.
- Motorola Moto G35 – Check price here
- Samsung Galaxy F34 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.