Motorola Moto G85 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo X200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Motorola Moto G85

Motorola Moto G85
-
Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
33W
-
6.67"
1080x2400 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30/60fps
-
Specs
2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold
6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver
1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925
3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
12GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
16GB 512GB (UFS 4.0)
f/1.8 (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF
f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p
f/2.4, (wide), 0.7µm
f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide)
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
12 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n28, n38, n40, n41, n77, n78
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo X200 with its Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3nm) performs better than the Motorola Moto G85 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Vivo X200 offers 4 years of OS updates, whereas Motorola Moto G85 provides 2 years. For security updates, Vivo X200 offers 5 years of support compared to Motorola Moto G85's 3 years.
Both Motorola Moto G85 and Vivo X200 feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Vivo X200 also boasts a brighter screen with 4500 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo X200 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Vivo X200 features a larger 5800 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo X200 also supports faster wired charging at 90W, compared to 33W on Motorola Moto G85.
Vivo X200 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP69 rating.
- Motorola Moto G85 – Check price here
- Vivo X200 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.