Motorola Razr 50 Ultra alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo V40e alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
-
Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
4 nm
-
4000 mAh
45W
-
6.9"
1080x2640 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30/60fps
- Specs
1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720
3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.0, (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 116˚ (ultrawide)
1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps
1080p
f/2.4, (wide), 0.7µm
f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: eSIM
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
17 5G bands
n1, n2, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n26, n28, n38, n40, n41, n66, n71, n75, n77, n78
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Vivo V40e with the Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both phones launched with Android 14 and will get updates until Android 17. Motorola Razr 50 Ultra will get security updates until 2029 (approx. 5 years), while Vivo V40e is supported till 2028.
Both Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and Vivo V40e feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. In terms of smoothness, Motorola Razr 50 Ultra offers a higher 165 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Vivo V40e also boasts a brighter screen with 4500 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Both phones have the same screen resolution.
Vivo V40e features a larger 5500 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo V40e also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 45W on Motorola Razr 50 Ultra. Motorola Razr 50 Ultra supports wireless charging at 15W, while Vivo V40e does not support wireless charging.
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra offers better protection against water and dust with an IPX8 rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.