Motorola Razr 60 Ultra alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
vivo X200 FE alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
-
Snapdragon 8 Elite
3 nm
-
4700 mAh
68W
-
7.0"
1224 x 2912 pixels
-
50 MP
8K@30fps
-
Specs
vivo X200 FE

vivo X200 FE
-
Dimensity 9300+
4 nm
-
6500 mAh
90W
-
6.31"
1216 x 2640 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30/60fps
-
Specs
2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L
6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M
1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4
3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720
16GB 512GB (UFS 3.1)
f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.0, 12mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 0.6µm, PDAF
f/1.88, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, Sony IMX921, PDAF
50 MP
f/2.65, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, Sony IMX882, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
8 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
4K@30/60/120fps
1080p@30/60/120/240fps
1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, HDR
f/2.0, (wide), 0.64µm
f/2.0, (wide), Samsung JN1
1080p@30/60fps
1080p
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
23 5G bands
n1, n2, n3, n5, n7, n8, n12, n14, n20, n25, n26, n28, n30, n38, n40, n41, n48, n66, n70, n71, n75, n77, n78
14 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n26, n28, n38, n40, n41, n71, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) performs better than the vivo X200 FE with the Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
vivo X200 FE launched with Android 15 and will receive updates until Android 19, whereas Motorola Razr 60 Ultra launched with Android 15 and will get Android 18. vivo X200 FE will get security updates until 2030 (approx. 5 years), while Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is supported till 2029.
Both Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and vivo X200 FE feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. In terms of smoothness, Motorola Razr 60 Ultra offers a higher 165 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. vivo X200 FE also boasts a brighter screen with 5000 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Motorola Razr 60 Ultra offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
vivo X200 FE features a larger 6500 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. vivo X200 FE also supports faster wired charging at 90W, compared to 68W on Motorola Razr 60 Ultra. Motorola Razr 60 Ultra supports wireless charging at 30W, while vivo X200 FE does not support wireless charging.
vivo X200 FE offers better protection against water and dust with an IP69 rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.