Motorola Razr 60 Ultra alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
-
Snapdragon 8 Elite
3 nm
-
4700 mAh
68W
-
7.0"
1224 x 2912 pixels
-
50 MP
8K@30fps
-
Specs
2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L
6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.0, 12mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 0.6µm, PDAF
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
4K@30/60/120fps
1080p@30/60/120/240fps
f/2.0, (wide), 0.64µm
f/2.5, (wide)
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N2, N3, N5, N7, N8, N12, N14, N20, N25, N26, N28, N30
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N48, N66, N70, N71, N75, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41
FDD: N1, N2, N3, N5, N7, N8, N12, N14, N20, N25, N26, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N48, N66, N70, N71, N75, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this comparison, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) performs better than the Vivo Y300 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra offers 3 years of OS updates, while the Vivo Y300 provides 2 years. When it comes to security updates, Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads with 4 years of support.
Both phones feature AMOLED displays. Moreover, it offers a higher 165 Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling. Motorola Razr 60 Ultra also has a brighter display with 4500 nits, improving outdoor visibility. Notably, Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Vivo Y300 has a larger 5000 mAh battery for longer usage. Vivo Y300 supports faster wired charging at 80W. Motorola Razr 60 Ultra supports wireless charging at 30W, while Vivo Y300 lacks this feature.
Vivo Y300 offers better water and dust resistance with an IP64 rating.