Motorola Razr 60 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F17 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Motorola Razr 60

Motorola Razr 60
-
Dimensity 7400
4 nm
-
4500 mAh
30W
-
6.9"
1080 x 2640 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
- Specs
Samsung Galaxy F17

Samsung Galaxy F17
-
Exynos 1330
5 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.7"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
2.6 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A78
2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
6GB 128GB
f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
13 MP
f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF
f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF, OIS, Up to 10x Digital Zoom
5 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro), 1/5.0", 1.75µm
1080p@30/60fps
gyro-EIS
f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm
f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: eSIM
16 5G bands
n1, n2, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n26, n28, n38, n40, n41, n66, n75, n77, n78
13 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n6, n7, n8, n26, n28, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Motorola Razr 60 with its MediaTek Dimensity 7400 (4nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy F17 with the Exynos 1330 (5nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy F17 offers 6 years of OS updates, whereas Motorola Razr 60 provides 3 years. For security updates, Samsung Galaxy F17 offers 6 years of support compared to Motorola Razr 60's 4 years.
Both Motorola Razr 60 and Samsung Galaxy F17 feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. In terms of smoothness, Motorola Razr 60 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Motorola Razr 60 also boasts a brighter screen with 3000 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Both phones have the same screen resolution.
Samsung Galaxy F17 features a larger 5000 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Motorola Razr 60 also supports faster wired charging at 30W, compared to 25W on Samsung Galaxy F17. Motorola Razr 60 supports wireless charging at 15W, while Samsung Galaxy F17 does not support wireless charging.
Samsung Galaxy F17 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP54 rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.