Motorola Razr 60 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Motorola Razr 60
Motorola Razr 60
-
Dimensity 7400
4 nm
-
4500 mAh
30W
-
6.9"
1080 x 2640 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
- Specs
2.6 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A78
2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
13 MP
f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
1080p@30/60fps
f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm
f/2.5, (wide)
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: eSIM
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
16 5G bands
n1, n2, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n26, n28, n38, n40, n41, n66, n75, n77, n78
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n38, n40, n41
In this performance comparison, the Motorola Razr 60 with its MediaTek Dimensity 7400 (4nm) performs better than the Vivo Y300 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Motorola Razr 60 offers 3 years of OS updates, whereas Vivo Y300 provides 2 years. For security updates, Motorola Razr 60 offers 4 years of support compared to Vivo Y300's 3 years.
Both Motorola Razr 60 and Vivo Y300 feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Motorola Razr 60 also boasts a brighter screen with 3000 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Both phones have the same screen resolution.
Vivo Y300 features a larger 5000 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo Y300 also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 30W on Motorola Razr 60. Motorola Razr 60 supports wireless charging at 15W, while Vivo Y300 does not support wireless charging.
Vivo Y300 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP64 rating.
- Vivo Y300 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.