Oppo A3 Pro alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Oppo A3 Pro
Oppo A3 Pro
-
Dimensity 6300
6 nm
-
5100 mAh
45W
-
6.67"
720x1604 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30/60fps
- Specs
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/2.0, (wide)
f/2.5, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
9 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n41, n77, n78
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n38, n40, n41
In this performance comparison, the Vivo Y300 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Oppo A3 Pro with the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both phones launched with Android 14 and will get updates until Android 16. Both phones are expected to receive security updates until around 2027.
Vivo Y300 features a superior AMOLED display, while Oppo A3 Pro comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Vivo Y300 also boasts a brighter screen with 1800 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo Y300 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Oppo A3 Pro comes with a larger 5100 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Vivo Y300 also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 45W on Oppo A3 Pro.
Vivo Y300 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP64 rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.