Oppo A5 Pro alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy M55s alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Oppo A5 Pro

Oppo A5 Pro
-
Dimensity 6300
6 nm
-
5800 mAh
45W
-
6.67"
720 x 1604 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30/60fps
-
Specs
Samsung Galaxy M55s

Samsung Galaxy M55s
-
Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
4 nm
-
5000 mAh
45W
-
6.7"
1080x2400 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710
3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 3.1)
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
(f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS)
8 MP
(f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide))
2 MP
(f/2.4, (macro))
1080p@30/60fps
f/2.0, (wide)
(f/2.4, (wide))
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
10 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n26, n28, n40, n41, n77, n78
13 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n28, n38, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Samsung Galaxy M55s with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm) performs better than the Oppo A5 Pro with the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy M55s offers 4 years of OS updates, while Oppo A5 Pro does not have confirmed OS update information. Samsung Galaxy M55s receives 5 years of security updates, while Oppo A5 Pro does not have confirmed security update information.
Samsung Galaxy M55s features a superior AMOLED display, while Oppo A5 Pro comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at 1000 nits. Notably, Samsung Galaxy M55s offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Oppo A5 Pro comes with a larger 5800 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Both devices support the same wired charging speed of 45W.
Oppo A5 Pro offers better protection against water and dust with an IP69 rating.
- Oppo A5 Pro – Check price here
- Samsung Galaxy M55s – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.