Oppo A5x 5G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
vivo X Fold5 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
vivo X Fold5

vivo X Fold5
-
Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
4 nm
-
6000 mAh
80W
-
8.03"
2200 x 2480 pixels
-
50 MP
8K@30fps
-
Specs
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4
3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720
2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720
2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520
f/1.9, (wide), AF
f/1.57, (wide), 1/1.56", Sony IMX921, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.55, 85mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", Sony IMX882, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
50 MP
f/2.1, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", Samsung JN1, PDAF
4K@30/60fps
1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS
f/2.2, (wide)
f/2.4, (wide)
f/2.4, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
2 5G bands
n3, n40
18 5G bands
n1, n2, n3, n5, n7, n8, n12, n20, n25, n26, n28, n38, n40, n41, n48, n66, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the vivo X Fold5 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Oppo A5x 5G with the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
vivo X Fold5 offers 4 years of OS updates, while Oppo A5x 5G does not have confirmed OS update information. vivo X Fold5 receives 5 years of security updates, while Oppo A5x 5G does not have confirmed security update information.
vivo X Fold5 features a superior AMOLED display, while Oppo A5x 5G comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. vivo X Fold5 also boasts a brighter screen with 4500 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, vivo X Fold5 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Both phones are equipped with the same 6000 mAh battery capacity. vivo X Fold5 also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 45W on Oppo A5x 5G. vivo X Fold5 supports wireless charging at 40W, while Oppo A5x 5G lacks this feature.
Oppo A5x 5G offers better protection against water and dust with an IP65 rating.
- Oppo A5x 5G – Check price here
- vivo X Fold5 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.