Oppo A5x 5G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo X200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925
3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720
16GB 512GB (UFS 4.0)
f/1.9, (wide), AF
f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p
f/2.2, (wide)
f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide)
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo X200 with its Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3nm) performs better than the Oppo A5x 5G with the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Vivo X200 features a superior AMOLED display, while Oppo A5x 5G comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Vivo X200 also boasts a brighter screen with 4500 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo X200 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Oppo A5x 5G comes with a larger 6000 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Vivo X200 also supports faster wired charging at 90W, compared to 45W on Oppo A5x 5G.
Vivo X200 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP69 rating.
- Oppo A5x 5G – Check price here
- Vivo X200 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.