Oppo F29 Pro alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Redmi Note 14 SE alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Oppo F29 Pro

Oppo F29 Pro
-
Dimensity 7300 Energy
4 nm
-
6000 mAh
80W
-
6.7"
1080 x 2412 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
Redmi Note 14 SE

Redmi Note 14 SE
-
Dimensity 7025
6 nm
-
5110 mAh
45W
-
6.67"
1080 x 2400 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 3.1)
12GB 256GB (UFS 3.1)
f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.88", PDAF, OIS
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/1.5, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/2.8"
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
1080p@30/60/120/480fps
720p@960fps
f/2.4, (wide)
f/2.2, (wide), 1/4.0", 0.7µm
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N78
In this performance comparison, the Oppo F29 Pro with its Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4nm) performs better than the Redmi Note 14 SE with the Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Oppo F29 Pro offers 2 years of OS updates, while Redmi Note 14 SE does not have confirmed OS update information. Oppo F29 Pro receives 3 years of security updates, while Redmi Note 14 SE does not have confirmed security update information.
Both Oppo F29 Pro and Redmi Note 14 SE feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Redmi Note 14 SE also boasts a brighter screen with 2100 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Both phones have the same screen resolution.
Oppo F29 Pro comes with a larger 6000 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Oppo F29 Pro also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 45W on Redmi Note 14 SE.
Oppo F29 Pro offers better protection against water and dust with an IP69 rating.
- Oppo F29 Pro – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.