Oppo F31 Pro Plus alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Poco X7 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Oppo F31 Pro Plus

Oppo F31 Pro Plus
-
Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
4 nm
-
7000 mAh
80W
-
6.8"
1280 x 2800 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715
3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
12GB 256GB (UFS 3.1)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, OmniVision OV50D40, PDAF, OIS, Up to 10x Optical Zoom
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth), 1/1.5", 1.75µm
f/1.5, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS
1080p@30/60/120fps
f/2.4, (wide), f/2.4, 1/3.1", 0.7µm, GalaxyCore 32E2
f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 0.7µm
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
10 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n38, n40, n41, n77, n78
14 5G bands
n1, n2, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n28, n38, n40, n41, n48, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Oppo F31 Pro Plus with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Poco X7 with the Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultra (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Poco X7 offers 3 years of OS updates, whereas Oppo F31 Pro Plus provides 2 years. For security updates, Poco X7 offers 4 years of support compared to Oppo F31 Pro Plus's 3 years.
Both Oppo F31 Pro Plus and Poco X7 feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Poco X7 also boasts a brighter screen with 3000 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Oppo F31 Pro Plus offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Oppo F31 Pro Plus comes with a larger 7000 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Oppo F31 Pro Plus also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 45W on Poco X7.
Both phones feature the same IP69 rating for water and dust resistance.
- Oppo F31 Pro Plus – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.