Oppo K13 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Tecno Spark 30C alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Tecno Spark 30C

Tecno Spark 30C
-
Dimensity 6300
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1600 pixels
-
48 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
1x2.3 GHz Cortex-A720s
3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A720s
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520s
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 3.1)
4GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
f/1.9, 27mm (wide), 1/2.88", OmniVision OV50D40, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
(wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF
1080p@30/60/120fps
f/2.5, 23mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm, Sony IMX840
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
In this performance comparison, the Oppo K13 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 (4nm) performs better than the Tecno Spark 30C with the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Oppo K13 features a superior AMOLED display, while Tecno Spark 30C comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Oppo K13 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Oppo K13 comes with a larger 7000 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Oppo K13 also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 18W on Tecno Spark 30C.
Oppo K13 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP65 rating.
- Oppo K13 – Check price here
- Tecno Spark 30C – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.