Oppo K13x alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
6GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
OmniVision OV50D, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP,
f/2.4, (Mono)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
GalaxyCore GC08A8, f/2.0, (wide)
f/2.5, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
9 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n41, n77, n78
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n38, n40, n41
In this performance comparison, the Vivo Y300 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Oppo K13x with the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both Oppo K13x and Vivo Y300 offer the same software support — 2 years of OS updates and 3 years of security updates.
Vivo Y300 features a superior AMOLED display, while Oppo K13x comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Vivo Y300 also boasts a brighter screen with 1800 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo Y300 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Oppo K13x comes with a larger 6000 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Vivo Y300 also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 45W on Oppo K13x.
Oppo K13x offers better protection against water and dust with an IP65 rating.
- Vivo Y300 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.