Oppo K13x alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 Plus alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 Plus

Vivo Y300 Plus
-
Snapdragon 695
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
44W
-
6.78"
1080 x 2400 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold
6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver
6GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
OmniVision OV50D, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP,
f/2.4, (Mono)
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
GalaxyCore GC08A8, f/2.0, (wide)
f/2.5, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
9 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n41, n77, n78
6 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo Y300 Plus with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6nm) performs better than the Oppo K13x with the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both Oppo K13x and Vivo Y300 Plus offer the same software support — 2 years of OS updates and 3 years of security updates.
Vivo Y300 Plus features a superior AMOLED display, while Oppo K13x comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Vivo Y300 Plus also boasts a brighter screen with 1300 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo Y300 Plus offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Oppo K13x comes with a larger 6000 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Oppo K13x also supports faster wired charging at 45W, compared to 44W on Vivo Y300 Plus.
Oppo K13x offers better protection against water and dust with an IP65 rating.
- Vivo Y300 Plus – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.