Oppo Reno13 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Redmi Note 14 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Oppo Reno13

Oppo Reno13
-
Dimensity 8350
4 nm
-
5600 mAh
80W
-
6.59"
1256 x 2760 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30/60fps
-
Specs
Redmi Note 14

Redmi Note 14
-
Dimensity 7025
6 nm
-
5110 mAh
45W
-
6.67"
1080 x 2400 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715
3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715
4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510
2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 3.1)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 15mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/1.5, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide)
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS
f/2.0, 21mm (wide), AF
f/2.2, (wide), 1/4.0", 0.7µm
1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
7 5G bands
n1, n5, n8, n28, n41, n77, n78
7 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n78
In this performance comparison, the Oppo Reno13 with its Mediatek Dimensity 8350 (4nm) performs better than the Redmi Note 14 with the Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Oppo Reno13 offers 3 years of OS updates, whereas Redmi Note 14 provides 2 years. Both phones receive the same 4 years of security updates.
Both Oppo Reno13 and Redmi Note 14 feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Redmi Note 14 also boasts a brighter screen with 2100 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Oppo Reno13 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Oppo Reno13 comes with a larger 5600 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Oppo Reno13 also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 45W on Redmi Note 14.
Oppo Reno13 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP68 rating.
- Oppo Reno13 – Check price here
- Redmi Note 14 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.