Oppo Reno13 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo T4 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Oppo Reno13

Oppo Reno13
-
Dimensity 8350
4 nm
-
5600 mAh
80W
-
6.59"
1256 x 2760 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30/60fps
-
Specs
1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715
3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715
4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510
1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A720
3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520
8GB 256GB (UFS 3.1)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
12GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 15mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, Sony IMX882, PDAF, OIS
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS
1080p@30fps
f/2.0, 21mm (wide), AF
f/2.0, (wide)
1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Oppo Reno13 with its Mediatek Dimensity 8350 (4nm) performs better than the Vivo T4 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Oppo Reno13 offers 3 years of OS updates, whereas Vivo T4 provides 2 years. For security updates, Oppo Reno13 offers 4 years of support compared to Vivo T4's 3 years.
Both Oppo Reno13 and Vivo T4 feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Vivo T4 also boasts a brighter screen with 5000 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Oppo Reno13 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Vivo T4 features a larger 7300 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo T4 also supports faster wired charging at 90W, compared to 80W on Oppo Reno13.
Oppo Reno13 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP68 rating.
- Oppo Reno13 – Check price here
- Vivo T4 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.