Oppo Reno14 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Redmi 13C alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Oppo Reno14

Oppo Reno14
-
Dimensity 8350
4 nm
-
6000 mAh
80W
-
6.59"
1256 x 2760 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30/60fps
-
Specs
1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715
3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715
4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
12GB 256GB (UFS 3.1)
12GB 512GB (UFS 3.1)
6GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
Sony LYT 600, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.8, 80mm (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom, upto 120x Digital Zoom
8 MP
f/2.2, 15mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF
f/1.8, 28mm (wide), PDAF
0.08 MP
(auxiliary lens)
1080p@30/60/120fps
f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.75", AF
1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: eSIM
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
16 5G bands
n1, n2, n3, n5, n7, n8, n12, n20, n26, n28, n38, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78
7 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n78
In this performance comparison, the Oppo Reno14 with its Mediatek Dimensity 8350 (4nm) performs better than the Redmi 13C with the Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Oppo Reno14 offers 3 years of OS updates, whereas Redmi 13C provides 2 years. Both phones receive the same 4 years of security updates.
Oppo Reno14 features a superior AMOLED display, while Redmi 13C comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Oppo Reno14 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Oppo Reno14 also boasts a brighter screen with 1200 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Oppo Reno14 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Oppo Reno14 comes with a larger 6000 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Oppo Reno14 also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 18W on Redmi 13C.
Oppo Reno14 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP69 rating.
- Oppo Reno14 – Check price here
- Redmi 13C – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.