Lava Bold alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Poco C75 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
6GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), Sony, AF
2 MP
macro
f/1.8, (wide)
Auxiliary lens
f/2.2, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N66, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N66, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N78
In this comparison, the Poco C75 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Bold with the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
The Poco C75 offers 2 years of OS updates, while the Lava Bold provides 1 years. When it comes to security updates, Poco C75 leads with 4 years of support.
Lava Bold has a superior AMOLED display, while Poco C75 uses an LCD panel. They have the same 120 Hz refresh rate. These phones offer the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Lava Bold has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Poco C75 has a larger 5160 mAh battery for longer usage. Lava Bold supports faster wired charging at 33W.
Lava Bold offers better water and dust resistance with an IP64 rating.