Poco C75 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F36 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F36
Samsung Galaxy F36
-
Exynos 1380
5 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.7"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
- Specs
2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 128GB
f/1.8, (wide)
Auxiliary lens
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.96", PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
1080p@30/60fps
720p@480fps, gyro-EIS
f/2.2, (wide)
f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
7 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n78
9 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n38, n40, n41, n78
In this performance comparison, the Samsung Galaxy F36 with its Exynos 1380 (5nm) performs better than the Poco C75 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy F36 offers 6 years of OS updates, whereas Poco C75 provides 2 years. For security updates, Samsung Galaxy F36 offers 6 years of support compared to Poco C75's 4 years.
Samsung Galaxy F36 features a superior AMOLED display, while Poco C75 comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Samsung Galaxy F36 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Poco C75 comes with a larger 5160 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Samsung Galaxy F36 also supports faster wired charging at 25W, compared to 18W on Poco C75.
Poco C75 includes an IP52 rating, while Samsung Galaxy F36 lacks an official IP rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.