Poco C75 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo V40 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715
3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
12GB 512GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, (wide)
Auxiliary lens
f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@30fps
f/2.2, (wide)
f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo V40 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Poco C75 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Vivo V40 offers 3 years of OS updates, whereas Poco C75 provides 2 years. Both phones receive the same 4 years of security updates.
Vivo V40 features a superior AMOLED display, while Poco C75 comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Vivo V40 also boasts a brighter screen with 4500 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo V40 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Vivo V40 features a larger 5500 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo V40 also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 18W on Poco C75.
Vivo V40 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP68 rating.
- Poco C75 – Check price here
- Vivo V40 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.