Poco C75 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo V40e alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, (wide)
Auxiliary lens
f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 116˚ (ultrawide)
1080p
f/2.2, (wide)
f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo V40e with its Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) performs better than the Poco C75 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Vivo V40e offers 3 years of OS updates, whereas Poco C75 provides 2 years. Both phones receive the same 4 years of security updates.
Vivo V40e features a superior AMOLED display, while Poco C75 comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Vivo V40e also boasts a brighter screen with 4500 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo V40e offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Vivo V40e features a larger 5500 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo V40e also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 18W on Poco C75.
Vivo V40e offers better protection against water and dust with an IP64 rating.
- Poco C75 – Check price here
- Vivo V40e – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.