Poco C75 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, (wide)
Auxiliary lens
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/2.2, (wide)
f/2.5, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this comparison, the Vivo Y300 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Poco C75 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2 (4nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
They offer the same OS update support. When it comes to security updates, Poco C75 leads with 4 years of support.
Vivo Y300 has a superior AMOLED display, while Poco C75 uses an LCD panel. They have the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Vivo Y300 also has a brighter display with 1800 nits, improving outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo Y300 has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Poco C75 has a larger 5160 mAh battery for longer usage. Vivo Y300 supports faster wired charging at 80W.
Vivo Y300 offers better water and dust resistance with an IP64 rating.